Bel voor een afspraak +32 (0) 496 10 01 21 of contacteer ons
$$
universiteit

De wetenschap als basis

Beide Tandarts-Specialisten vinden de wisselwerking tussen zorg en wetenschap uitermate belangrijk en combineren daarom hun consultaties in Zottegem met wetenschappelijk onderzoek aan de Universiteit Gent.

Het onderzoek van Prof. Dr. Jan Cosyn en Prof. Dr. Thomas De Bruyckere is voornamelijk gericht op het optimaliseren van implantaatbehandelingen en resulteerde inmiddels in 149 internationale publicaties die men kan raadplegen via PubMed.

wetenschapsboeken
Publication on PubMed

PubMed 149

Feasibility of Immediate, Early and Delayed Implant Placement for Single Tooth Replacement in

To assess the feasibility of immediate (IIP), early (EIP) and delayed implant placement (DIP) for single tooth replacement in the premaxilla on the basis of the complete indication area of each approach in routine practice.

A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Timing of Soft-Tissue Augmentation in Immediate Implant

To assess the impact of the timing of soft-tissue augmentation (STA) on mean buccal bone changes following immediate implant placement (IPP) in the anterior maxilla.

Early implant placement versus ridge preservation and delayed implant placement: Analysis of

To compare early implant placement (EP) to alveolar ridge preservation and delayed implant placement (ARP/DP) in terms of contour changes, along with clinician- and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) until the delivery of the implant-supported restoration.

Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different 3-dimensional

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed surgical guides for fully guided immediate implants from different manufacturers.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Collagen Matrix to Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge as Socket

(1) This study aimed to compare a collagen matrix to a hemostatic gelatin sponge as a socket seal in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP). (2) Systemically healthy patients planned for ARP at two sites with more than 50% of the buccal bone wall remaining after tooth extraction were eligible for